Skip to main content

Table 3 Assessment score of China’s contributions to RNAS+ by survey respondents

From: Assessment of China’s contributions to the Regional Network for Asian Schistosomiasis and Other Helminth Zoonoses: a questionnaire survey

Variable

Score*

Average score**

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

China’s contributions to improving of capacity building of RNAS+? N(%)#

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

4(11.11%)

8(22.22%)

11(30.56%)

13(36.11%)

8.92

China’s funding contributions to RNAS+? N(%)#

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

1(2.78%)

0(0%)

2(5.56%)

4(11.11%)

7(19.44%)

9(25%)

13(36.11%)

8.64

China’s contributions to the coordination of RNAS+? N(%)#

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

1(2.78%)

2(5.56%)

3(8.33%)

6(16.67%)

11(30.56%)

13(36.11%)

8.75

China’s contributions to applying for cooperation programme / project jointly with RNAS+ member institutions? N(%)#

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

2(5.56%)

1(2.78%)

3(8.33%)

7(19.44%)

11(30.56%)

12(33.33%)

8.67

The overall assessment of China’s contributions in RNAS+? N(%)#

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

2(5.56%)

2(5.56%)

8(22.22%)

13(36.11%)

11(30.56%)

8.81

  1. * The scores given by the respondents about China’s contributions to RNAS+ from the questionnaire, “0 score” means no contribution, and “10 score” indicated 100% contribution. The higher the score, the more important China’s contributions to RNAS+
  2. ** Average score: the sum of all scores marked by the respondents / the total number of respondents
  3. # N(%): the number of respondents by each score (the number of respondents by each score/total number of respondents × 100%)