Skip to main content

Table 3 Assessment score of China’s contributions to RNAS+ by survey respondents

From: Assessment of China’s contributions to the Regional Network for Asian Schistosomiasis and Other Helminth Zoonoses: a questionnaire survey

Variable Score* Average score**
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
China’s contributions to improving of capacity building of RNAS+? N(%)# 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 4(11.11%) 8(22.22%) 11(30.56%) 13(36.11%) 8.92
China’s funding contributions to RNAS+? N(%)# 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(2.78%) 0(0%) 2(5.56%) 4(11.11%) 7(19.44%) 9(25%) 13(36.11%) 8.64
China’s contributions to the coordination of RNAS+? N(%)# 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(2.78%) 2(5.56%) 3(8.33%) 6(16.67%) 11(30.56%) 13(36.11%) 8.75
China’s contributions to applying for cooperation programme / project jointly with RNAS+ member institutions? N(%)# 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(5.56%) 1(2.78%) 3(8.33%) 7(19.44%) 11(30.56%) 12(33.33%) 8.67
The overall assessment of China’s contributions in RNAS+? N(%)# 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(5.56%) 2(5.56%) 8(22.22%) 13(36.11%) 11(30.56%) 8.81
  1. * The scores given by the respondents about China’s contributions to RNAS+ from the questionnaire, “0 score” means no contribution, and “10 score” indicated 100% contribution. The higher the score, the more important China’s contributions to RNAS+
  2. ** Average score: the sum of all scores marked by the respondents / the total number of respondents
  3. # N(%): the number of respondents by each score (the number of respondents by each score/total number of respondents × 100%)
Back to article page

Global Health Research and Policy

ISSN: 2397-0642

Contact us