Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of the included studies

From: Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions

Author (references)

Country

Publication year

Affiliation

Domain

Type of study

Model used

Intervention and comparator

Adibi et al. [21]

Iran

2004

National

Infectious

CEA (per infection averted)

Decision tree

HBsAg screening for all premarriage individuals and prevention protocol for seronegative subjects or HBsAg screening for all premarriage individuals, HBcAb screening in the HBsAg negative spouses of the HBsAg positive persons, and prevention protocol Vs no screening and no prevention

Al Abri et al. [22]

Oman

2020

National and International

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

Different testing programs using an IGRA versus the TST, combined with QFT-Plus with 6H, QFT-Plus with 3HP, QFT-Plus with 4R, TST with 6H, TST with 3HP and directly observed therapy, TST with 4R, Vs CXR alone

Al‐Qudah et al. [23]

Jordan

2019

National and International

NCDs

CBA

NA

Clinical pharmacist intervention (home medication management review, patient education on drug-drug interactions, dosage adjustment, patient education on the importance of adherence to their medication regime, etc.) Vs routine care

Assanelli et al. [24]

Algeria and others

2015

National and International

CVDs

CEA (per LYG)

NR

ECG in combination with family and personal history and physical examination (no comparator was reported)

Balicer et al. [25]

Israel

2005

National

Infectious

CBA

NA

3 strategies for the use of stockpiled antiviral drugs during a pandemic: (1) therapeutic use, (2) long-term preexposure prophylaxis, and (3) short-term postexposure prophylaxis for close contacts of influenza patients

Barfar et al. [26]

Iran

2014

National

Cancer

CEA (per case detected)

NR

Mammography breast cancer screening Vs no screening

Carvalho et al. [27]

Afghanistan

2013

National and International

Maternal diseases

CEA (per LYS)

Decision tree

Family planning strategies Vs combined several interventions (Integrated reproductive health and pregnancy-related services)

Chodick et al. [28]

Israel

2005

National

Infectious

CEA (per case avoided)

Decision tree and Markov

Mass Varicella zoster virus vaccination, screening followed by vaccination, vaccination of carriers and do nothing (status quo situation)

Chodick et al. [29]

Israel

2002

National

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

Mass Hepatitis A vaccination, screening and vaccination Vs passive immunization (status quo strategy)

Chowers [30]

Israel

2017

National

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

Universal prenatal HIV screening compared with the current high risk only screening policy

Devine [31]

Afghanistan and others

2020

International

Infectious

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Gender-based treatment according to qualitative G6PD rapid diagnostic screening Vs routine care

El-Dahiyat [32]

Jordan

2017

National

All

CMA

NA

Generic medicines Vs originator brand medicines

El-Ghitany [33]

Egypt

2019

National

Infectious

CEA (per test performed)

NR

EGCRISC use Vs mass screening

Eltabbakh et al. [34]

Egypt

2015

National

Cancer

CUA (per QALY)

NR

HCC screening program by ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein Vs diagnosis outside the program

Gamaoun et al. [35]

Tunisia

2018

National

Cancer

CEA (per case avoided)

Decision tree

Two-dose HPV vaccine for young girls Vs screening with three time-lapse Pap smear test

Ginsberg et al. [36]

Israel

1998

National

Genetic disorders

CBA

NA

Combined educational and national prenatal screening programs for thalassemia by blood samples test then electrophoresis for samples with abnormal values followed by counselling Vs no screening

Ginsberg et al. [37]

Israel

2013

National

Cancer

CUA (per DALY)

Markov

Screening with removal of cancerous lesions, Three doses of HPV vaccine with or without booster dose every 20 years for 12-year old girls, treatment of all cancer cases, and combinations of these interventions in different scenarios Vs current policy (Treat all cases and annual screening of 12.1% of females aged 12–70 with Pap smear)

Ginsberg et al. [38]

Israel

2020

National

Infectious

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Continuous HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis regimen Vs on-demand HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

Ginsberg et al. [39]

Israel

2007

National

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Markov

Screening with Pap smear (annually, tri-annually and penta-annually), HPV-DNA testing, or Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) -All followed by removal of cancerous lesions-, prevention by vaccination (3 doses of HPV vaccine with or without booster dose every 10 years for 12-year old girls), treatment of all cancer cases, screening and treatment, vaccination and treatment, and combination of prevention, screening and treatment. All strategies Vs current policy (all cases are treated and 12.2% of females aged 12–70 receive Pap smear)

Ginsberg et al. [40]

Israel

2012

National

CVDs

CUA (per DALY)

NR

Home, school, workplace, restaurant and supermarket-based interventions, screening, media strategies, taxation of unhealthful food products, provision of government subsidies to reduce the price of healthful foods [and vice-versa], mandatory food labeling, and prohibiting the sale of unhealthful foods in vending machines

Haghighat et al. [41]

Iran

2016

National and International

Cancer

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

Mammography screening strategy Vs no screening

Hamdani et al. [42]

Pakistan

2020

National and International

Mental diseases

CEA (per unit change in anxiety, depression and functioning scores)

NR

Problem Management + Vs enhanced usual care

Howard et al. [43]

Pakistan

2017

National and International

Infectious

CUA (per DALY), CEA (per LYG, case prevented, death prevented)

NR

Vector control using annual indoor residual spraying Vs routine malaria diagnosis and treatment

Hussain et al. [44]

Pakistan

2019

International

Infectious

CUA (per DALY), CEA (per patient treated)

Decision tree and Markov

Active case finding program using incentives Vs the existing passive case finding and treatment program

Javadinasab et al. [45]

Iran

2017

National

Cancer

CUA (per QALY) and CEA (per LYG)

Markov

Colonoscopy screening every 5 years starting at age 40, screening every 10 years starting at age 40, screening every 5 years starting at age 50, screening every 10 years starting at age 50, screening once/lifetime at age 50, and screening once/lifetime at age 55 Vs no screening

Javanbakht [46]

Iran

2018

National and International

CVDs

CEA (per capita healthcare cost)

Markov

Adequate dairy foods consumption Vs inadequate dairy foods consumption

Kashi et al. [47]

Pakistan and others

2019

International

Malnutrition

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Multiple micronutrient supplementation Vs iron and folic acid supplementation

Khneisser et al. [48]

Lebanon

2015

National

Genetic disorders

CBA

NA

Expanded newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism by using tandem mass spectrometry followed by diagnostic confirmation and management Vs clinical "late" detection

Khneisser et al. [49]

Lebanon

2007

National

Genetic disorders

CBA

NA

G6PD deficiency screening Vs no screening

Kim et al. [50]

Egypt

2015

National and International

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

One-time screening and follow-up treatment for HCV infection Vs the current strategy of no screening

Kim et al. [51]

Algeria, Lebanon, and Turkey

2013

National and International

Cancer

For vaccination: CUA (per DALY). For screening: CEA (per LYS)

Decision tree

Three doses of HPV vaccine for all 12-year girls in MENA countries and combination of screening and vaccination in Algeria, Lebanon, and Turkey Vs no intervention

Koren et al. [52]

Israel

2014

National

Genetic disorders

CEA (per case prevented)

NR

Thalassemia prevention program Vs routine treatment of β Thalassemia major and its complications

Lahiri et al. [53]

MENA and others

2005

International

Back pain

CEA (per LYG)

Markov

Worker training, engineering controls coupled with administrative controls, a combination of worker training and engineering controls, and the full ergonomics program Vs no intervention

Leshno et al. [54]

Israel

2003

National

Cancer

CEA

Markov

One-time colonoscopic screening, colonoscopy followed by a 10-year follow-up, annual FOBT, annual FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy, and annual detection of altered human DNA in stool Vs no screening

Lim et al. [55]

Pakistan

2020

National and international

Infectious

CEA (per cured case)

Markov

HCV Screening and treatment Vs no interventions

Lohse et al. [56]

Israel and others

2011

International

DM

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and lifestyle change Vs no intervention

Madae’en et al. [57]

Jordan

2020

National

Smoking

CEA (per LYG)

Markov

Varenicline for 3 months, NRT (combined patch and gum) for 3 months, and physician advice over three visits with no medications Vs no intervention

Marseille et al. [58]

Israel and others

2013

National and international

DM

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Initial screening tests, antenatal care for Gestational DM women, and post-partum DM prevention interventions Vs no Gestational DM screening and treatment

Mason et al. [59]

Tunisia, Syria, Palestine and Turkey

2014

National and International

CVDs

CEA (per LYG)

Decision tree

Health promotion campaign, labelling of food packaging or mandatory salt reduction of processed foods Vs no policy

Messoudi et al. [60]

Morocco

2019

National and International

Cancer

CEA (per LYG)

Markov

Screening of women aged 30–49 years with a VIA test every 3 years Vs no intervention, two doses of HPV vaccine for pre-adolescent girls Vs no intervention, and combined HPV vaccine and screening Vs screening alone

Mostafa et al. [61]

Egypt

2019

National and International

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree and Markov

Safety-engineered syringes Vs conventional syringes

Mostafa et al. [62]

Egypt

2019

National

Infectious

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree

Safety-engineered syringes Vs conventional syringes

Nahvijou et al. [63]

Iran

2016

National and International

Cancer

CUA (per QALY)

Markov

11 different screening strategies with different periodicities and different intervals Vs no screening

Okem et al. [64]

Turkey

2017

National

Genetic disorders

CEA (per cases detected or procedural related losses avoided)

Decision tree

For women < 35-year of age: triple test, combined test, Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Test (NIPT) by using cell free fetal DNA, NIPT as a second-step screening for high-risk patients detected by triple test, and NIPT as a second-step screening for high-risk patients detected by combined test. For women ≥ 35-year of age: implementing invasive test (amniocentesis) and NIPT for all women were compared Vs current screening strategies

Ornoy et al. [65]

Israel

2019

National

Genetic disorders

CBA

NA

National screening program for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among school children and continue treatment until adulthood. The comparator was not reported

Ranson et al. [66]

MENA

2002

International

Smoking

CUA (per DALYs)

NR

Price increases, NRT, and a package of non-price interventions other than NRT (such as comprehensive bans on advertising and promotion, bans on smoking in public places, prominent warning labels and mass consumer information). The comparator was not reported

Rashidian et al. [67]

Iran

2015

National

Infectious

CEA (per percentages of volume reduction and weight reduction)

Decision tree

Medical waste treatment devices called Saray 1, Saray 2, Sazgar, KAZU, Newster, Ecodas T150, Ecodas T300, and Newster 10, Vs Caspian-Alborz

Rezaei-Hemami et al. [68]

Iran

2014

National

Infectious

CEA (per averted malaria case)

NR

Larviciding, indoor residual spraying, insecticide treated net, set up the diagnosis and treatment in less than 24 h, and set up the border facilities Vs each other

Saygili et al. [69]

Turkey

2019

National

Cancer

CEA (per quality of life unit and level of satisfaction)

NR

Comprehensive palliative care center, hospital inpatient services, and home healthcare services Vs each other

Shamshiri et al. [70]

Iran

2012

National and International

Genetic disorders

CUA (per DALY)

Decision tree

Congenital hypothyroidism screening programs Vs no screening

Sharma et al. [71]

Lebanon

2017

National and International

Cancer

CEA (per LYS)

Markov

Increasing cytologic screening coverage to 50% at 3 and 5 years interval Vs annual screening at 20% coverage

Shlomai et al. [72]

Israel

2020

National

Infectious

CUA (per QALY) and CEA (per death prevented)

Markov

Social distancing and national lockdown Vs complete isolation of infected individuals or individuals at high exposure risk in a dedicated facility

Shmueli et al. [73]

Israel

2013

National and International

Cancer

CUA (per QALY)

Decision tree

Low-dose computed tomography screening Vs no screening

Sladkevicius et al. [74]

Libya

2010

National and International

Genetic disorders

CEA (per LYG)

Decision tree

Neonatal screening for Phenylketonuria Vs no screening

Verguet et al. [75]

Djibouti, Mauritania, Somalia, Sudan and others

2013

International

Infectious

CUA (per DALY)

Markov

Adding HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis at pre-existing levels Vs existing HIV prevention interventions (male circumcision, antiretroviral therapy and condom use)

Vijayaraghavan et al. [76]

Afghanistan

2006

International

Infectious

CEA (per deaths averted)

Markov

Catch-up and follow-up measles campaigns Vs no measles campaigns

Vijayaraghavan et al. [77]

Somalia

2012

International

Maternal diseases

CEA (per LYG)

NR

Child health days strategy to deliver multiple maternal and child health interventions Vs ‘‘best buys’’ interventions

Wilcox et al. [78]

Syria

2015

National and International

CVDs

CEA (per LYG)

Decision tree

Health promotion campaign about salt reduction, labeling of salt content on packaged foods, reformulation of salt content within packaged foods, and combinations of the three strategies Vs absence of any policy

Yarahmadi et al. [79]

Iran

2010

National

Genetic disorders

CBA

NA

Newborn screening program for congenital hypothyroidism Vs no screening

Yosefy et al. [80]

Israel

2007

National

CVDs

CUA (per DALY)

NR

Nationwide program to reduce hypertension Vs no intervention

Yosefy et al. [81]

Israel

2003

National

CVDs

CUA (per QALY)

NR

Expansion of the blood pressure control program to 100 clinics nationwide Vs 30 clinics only

  1. 3HP 3 months of weekly rifapentine 900 mg plus isoniazid 900 mg, 6H 6 months of daily isoniazid 300 mg, 4R 4 months of daily rifampicin 600 mg, HBcAb hepatitis B core antibody, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, CBA cost–benefit analysis, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, CMA cost-minimization analysis, CUA cost-utility analysis, CVDs cardiovascular diseases, CXR chest X-ray, DALYs disability adjusted life years, DM diabetes mellitus, ECG electrocardiogram, EGCRISC Egyptian hepatitis C virus risk score screening tool, FOBT fecal occult blood test, G6PD glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, HCV hepatitis C virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HPV human papillomavirus, HPV-DNA human papillomavirus DNA assay, IGRA interferon gamma release assay, LYG life years gained, LYS life years saved, MENA Middle East and North Africa, NA not applicable, NCDs noncommunicable diseases, NIPT non-invasive prenatal screening test, NR not reported, NRT nicotine replacement therapy, Pap smear Papanicolaou test, QALYs quality-adjusted life years, QFT-Plus QuantiFERON-TB gold plus, TST tuberculin skin test, VIA visual inspection with acetic acid, Vs versus