Table 4 Surveillance outcomes of Healthy China Initiative in the 21 regions with FCE method
Time | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Total Score | Rank | Total Score | Rank | Total Score | Rank |
Chengdu | 69.553 | 1 | 73.366 | 1 | 80.336 | 1 |
Zigong | 56.698 | 20 | 57.561 | 20 | 62.058 | 19 |
Panzhihua | 62.419 | 5 | 62.901 | 9 | 63.892 | 11 |
Luzhou | 63.667 | 3 | 64.469 | 4 | 65.252 | 5 |
Deyang | 59.255 | 13 | 60.766 | 16 | 61.806 | 20 |
Mianyang | 61.273 | 8 | 63.406 | 6 | 65.139 | 6 |
Guangyuan | 62.508 | 4 | 63.094 | 7 | 63.845 | 12 |
Suining | 58.512 | 15 | 60.791 | 15 | 62.989 | 17 |
Neijiang | 57.729 | 17 | 60.487 | 17 | 63.316 | 16 |
Leshan | 58.332 | 16 | 60.889 | 14 | 63.716 | 13 |
Nanchong | 59.897 | 12 | 61.514 | 13 | 63.425 | 14 |
Meishan | 59.974 | 11 | 61.561 | 12 | 65.079 | 7 |
Yibin | 63.844 | 23 | 65.779 | 2 | 67.638 | 2 |
Guang'an | 60.276 | 10 | 62.504 | 10 | 64.034 | 10 |
Dazhou | 60.835 | 9 | 63.075 | 8 | 64.740 | 8 |
Ya'an | 58.883 | 14 | 61.781 | 11 | 65.252 | 4 |
Bazhong | 61.693 | 6 | 65.078 | 3 | 67.110 | 3 |
Ziyang | 57.292 | 18 | 59.701 | 18 | 63.368 | 15 |
A'ba | 56.596 | 21 | 57.556 | 21 | 59.010 | 21 |
Ganzi | 56.995 | 19 | 58.027 | 19 | 62.154 | 18 |
Liangshan | 61.665 | 7 | 63.560 | 5 | 64.405 | 9 |