Skip to main content
Download PDF

Developing a conceptual framework for the health protection of United Nations peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic from global health perspectives

Global Health Research and Policy volume 7, Article number: 45 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed particular health risks to United Nations peacekeepers, which require prompt responses and global attention. Since the health protection of United Nations peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic is a typical global health problem, strategies from global health perspectives may help address it. From global health perspectives, and referring to the successful health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia, a conceptual framework was developed for the health protection of United Nations peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic. Within this framework, the features include multiple cross-borders (cross-border risk factors, impact, and actions); multiple risk factors (Social Determinants of Health), multiple disciplines (public health, medicine, politics, diplomacy, and others), and extensive interdepartmental cooperation. These strategies include multiple phases (before-deployment, during-deployment, and post-deployment), multi-level cooperation networks (the United Nations, host countries, troop-contributing countries, the United Nations peacekeeping team, and United Nations peacekeepers), and concerted efforts from various dimensions (medical, psychological, and social).

Background

Peacekeeping by the United Nations (UN) helps countries attrited by wars to create conditions for lasting peace, which has been proven to be one of the most effective ways to help countries navigate the difficult path from conflict to peace [1]. UN peacekeepers often face life-threatening health risks such as incidents, infectious or other diseases, and psychological trauma [2,3,4,5]. From 2000 to 2017, 2042 UN peacekeepers died, of which 879 deaths were caused by infectious or other diseases (43%), far more than the number of deaths caused by incidents (602, 29.5%) and violence (407, 19.9%) [6]. Therefore, health protection for UN peacekeepers is of significant importance. Since January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a public health emergency of international concern [7]. The outbreak of COVID-19 poses a new threat and has multiple impacts on UN peacekeepers’ health protection [8]. For example, by October 1, 2020, there were 463 COVID-19 cases, including three deaths among Minusca peacekeepers in the Central African Republic, and by November 25, 2020, there were 171 COVID-19 cases, including six fatalities among Monusco peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of Congo [9]. To deal with the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic faced by UN peacekeepers, comprehensive measures should be taken to prevent infection and protect their health promptly.

There are several measures for protecting the health of UN peacekeepers against COVID-19. At the beginning of the outbreak, the UN Security Council resolved in March 2020 to address the security issues faced by UN peacekeepers and emphasize their health and safety protection [10]. Given that UN peacekeepers’ cross-border movement might bring COVID-19 transmission risks to host countries [11], the UN took measures, including restricting UN peacekeepers’ cross-border rotation, requiring them to maintain social distance, and requesting their constant attention on the latest epidemic trends [12]. The UN came up with the Core Pre-deployment Training Materials, the Course Handbook, and the Student Handbook for instructors on COVID-19 pre-deployment awareness training in October 2020, providing essential knowledge for UN peacekeepers on epidemic protection, such as personal hygiene measures, quarantine, and trainees’ responsibilities for self-protection [13, 14]. Furthermore, the UN coordinated COVID-19 humanitarian vaccination for peacekeepers and citizens in host countries, as the coronavirus kept mutating into Delta, Omicron, and other variants [15, 16]. However, host countries, the UN, and UN peacekeepers have limited knowledge and capacity to fight the COVID-19 pandemic [17]: host countries seem to have inefficient medical and health systems for UN peacekeepers’ health protection against COVID-19 [18]. Although there are training materials provided for peacekeepers by the UN, knowledge, and training regarding features of COVID-19 seem insufficient; UN peacekeepers from different countries with various cultural backgrounds may have conflicting perceptions and take inconsistent actions against the COVID-19 pandemic [19].

The health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic and other infectious diseases such as Ebola and Avian Influenza are considered a global health problem [20, 21]. Strategies from global health perspectives may help address these problems. For example, no members of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team deployed to provide vital medical care in Liberia were infected because comprehensive and multi-disciplinary measures were taken from global health perspectives [3]. Similarly, comprehensive measures taken from global health perspectives may support the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic [22, 23]. Therefore, a conceptual framework with features to understand the issue and strategies to address it may be necessary for UN peacekeepers’ health protection against COVID-19. The purpose of this study is to develop such a framework containing features and strategies for the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic, with the guidance of global health characteristics and global health governance [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and the experiences of the Chinese medical team’s health protection during the Ebola pandemic in Liberia [3].

Global health and global health governance

Global health is the study of health problems, health issues, and health concerns the impact of which may transcend national borders, and it may be affected by the environment and experience of other countries, to promote health for all [24,25,26]. Changes in global health governance require extensive multi-disciplinary cooperation within and outside the health fields and international collaborative actions crossing national borders [27]. Global health has the following characteristics: (1) Cross-border risk factors, impact, and collective efforts. Since global health may be affected by the factors of other countries, the risk factors are cross-borders. Global health has a cross-border impact because it can be transferred to other countries. Different countries across borders are required to bring useful insights and take collective action to address global health problems [28, 29]. (2) Interdisciplinary cooperation. Professionals from various disciplines inside and outside health can cooperate and contribute to improving global health [30, 31]. (3) Interdepartmental cooperation. Wide social determinants of health (SDH) are associated with global health problems, and consequently, it is essential to utilize interdepartmental cooperation among health, political, cultural, educational, and other departments [32, 33].

Global health governance refers to using formal and informal institutions, rules, and processes to deal with global health problems [34]. (1) Establishing cooperative networks to strengthen global health systems. Action should be taken from bilateral, regional, and multilateral perspectives to facilitate the establishment of a cooperative network among governments, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), public-private partnerships (PPPs), and others [35]. To strengthen global health systems, it is vital to implement important treaties on global health problems, produce effective responses to global health threats, and prevent health problems from becoming global dangers [36]. (2) Enabling multiple efforts from various perspectives. By considering the social determinants of health, multiple efforts should be made to address global health issues from political, economic, and social contexts to the local, neighborhood, and household levels [37]. It also involves implementing international regulations and laws from security, economics, human rights, and other scopes to seek multipurpose surveillance and intervention against global health problems [38].

Features of health protection among UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic

Multiple cross-border factors related to the COVID-19 infection and control among UN peacekeepers

(1) Cross-borders Global health problems have cross-border risk factors and require countries to take collective action to address them [28]. UN peacekeepers who travel across borders to complete peacekeeping missions face potential risks of contracting COVID-19 [39]. The impact of COVID-19 among UN peacekeepers is cross-border because the COVID-19 pandemic could impact peacekeepers’ completion of missions and threaten the health of contacts at home and abroad. Therefore, collective actions from troop-contributing countries, host countries, and the UN would be more effective in COVID-19 prevention and control among UN peacekeepers. (2) Multiple factors During the Ebola pandemic in Liberia, the Chinese medical team faced and identified multiple risk factors, including resource-limited living and working environment, the lack of social networks and the experience of political unrest, an underdeveloped local public health system, and anxiety and fear of contracting infectious diseases [3]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, they face multiple risk factors, including poor natural environments, such as extreme weather and natural disasters, and backward industrial environments, such as unsanitary water use and the lack of medical facilities [40]. UN peacekeepers’ diverse health education, health literacy, family backgrounds, and income levels can lead to different perceptions and actions regarding health protection against COVID-19 [41]. The health protection of UN peacekeepers against COVID-19 is influenced by their health conditions, including lifestyle and disease. Many UN peacekeepers have mental health problems like depression, anxiety, and infectious diseases like HIV and AIDS. It was reported that 20% of Australian veterans of UN peacekeepers in Somalia had problems with anger control, 29% of Canadian peacekeeping veterans had depressive disorders after deployment, and in Sub-Saharan Africa, mandatory HIV testing was reported by 71%, occurring before deployments and peacekeeping missions [42,43,44,45]. In addition, access to health facilities, the availability of vaccinations, the health condition of local vulnerable groups such as children, women, and the elderly, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as facial masks and other personal hygiene products can also be regarded as risk factors in UN peacekeepers’ health protection against COVID-19 [46, 47].

Multiple interdisciplines in health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers

Global health has interdisciplinary characteristics that require professionals from various disciplines to cooperate in solving global health problems [25]. Global health is dedicated to improving health equity for all human beings and integrating health protection into all policies by involving various disciplines in the policy-making process and initiating cooperation among various disciplines [30,31,32]. The health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia has a multi-disciplinary feature involving experts with public health credentials, professionals from clinical medicine, preventive medicine, biology, laws, management, sociology, and other backgrounds.

Based on interdisciplinary characteristics in global health and the multi-disciplinary feature in the health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia, the health protection of UN peacekeepers against COVID-19 has multiple interdisciplinary features. (1) Public health. Promoting health for all and interdepartmental cooperation regarding global health characteristics can help solve emergent public health crises. For example, the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia involved experts with public health credentials for health protection [3]. The health protection of UN peacekeepers requires insights from the public health discipline to prevent coronavirus infections in large groups [48]. (2) Medicine. With the aim of achieving health for all, referring to the experience of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia [3], experts from clinical medicine, preventive medicine, and other medical backgrounds can help provide UN peacekeepers with medical treatment, including diagnosis, prescriptions, injections, transfusions, and surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic [49, 50]. (3) Politics. Global health is dedicated to improving health equity for all human beings and integrating health protection into policies [30,31,32]. For instance, the Chinese medical team referred to successful policies and procedures for disease in their health protection in Liberia [3]. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, political bodies could look at this problem cooperatively from a global standpoint and take political actions such as implementing regulations and laws to protect UN peacekeepers’ health [22]. (4) Diplomacy. Global health requires countries to take collective action to address global health issues across borders [28]. The Chinese medical team coordinated embassies and local Chinese enterprises to mitigate supply shortages during the Ebola pandemic in Liberia [3]. For the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to take humanitarian measures in health diplomacy from regional, bilateral, and multilateral perspectives in governments and organizations [51]. (5) Others. Based on the interdisciplinary features of global health characteristics, given experience in the health protection of Chinese medical teams in Liberia, disciplines such as biology, laws, management, and sociology could be used in UN peacekeepers’ health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic [3, 52].

Multiple interdepartmental cooperation in health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers

Global health facilitates interdepartmental cooperation between health, political, cultural, educational, and other departments. To address global health problems, it is essential to utilize interdepartmental collaboration regarding the social determinants of health and promote human health development [27, 29, 33]. During the Ebola pandemic in Liberia, the Chinese medical team not only utilized support from Chinese departments in government but also gained experience from local governments in Liberia and departments and organizations from other countries. By visiting the stadium in Monrovia and existing Ebola treatment centers from other countries in Liberia, the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team addressed health problems from physical, social, and cultural perspectives [3].

Given the interdepartmental cooperation in global health and the relative experience of visiting local and foreign departments, the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic has multiple interdepartmental cooperation features, including cooperation among governments, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and public-private partnerships (PPPs). (1) Government. Health departments in different countries could negotiate and develop strategies against the coronavirus, such as controlling viral transmission through trade and travel and implementing quarantine to reduce the burden on health systems [52, 53]. (2) IGOs. IGOs such as the H4 + partnership in the UN (WHO, World Bank, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations International Children’s Fund, and Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS) could cooperate to ensure UN peacekeepers’ health during the COVID-19 pandemic [54]. The WHO established the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network in response to significant and emergent infectious diseases [55]. (3) NGOs. NGOs that are not-for-profit and humanitarian in nature play a key role in reporting public health concerns and initiating global programs across borders for the health protection of UN peacekeepers against COVID-19. Charity group foundations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Doctors Without Borders, Medecins Sans Frontieres could support the health of UN peacekeepers during the COVID-19 pandemic [56]. (4) PPPs. PPPs, including the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and Think Tank, can cooperate in the health protection of UN peacekeepers, such as providing them with sufficient vaccines [57, 58]. (5) Others. Moreover, various human rights bodies, regional efforts, bilateral programs, and initiatives can contribute to UN peacekeepers’ health protection against COVID-19 [59]. For example, the COVAX project was established through the joint efforts of the GAVI Alliance, the Alliance for Epidemic Prevention Innovation, and the WHO to provide countries with vaccination support and improve medical availability among UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic [60].

Strategies for the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic

Multi-phases of health protection against COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers

During the Ebola pandemic, the Chinese medical team took measures in three phases (before deployment, during deployment, and post deployment) to protect their health. Before deployment, the Chinese medical team had the experience of attending a 1.5-month intensive health training program on the procedures of Ebola [3]. During deployment, the Chinese medical team had experience implementing a three-level safety supervision program for the health protection of all staff [3]. After deployment, the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team had the experience of being isolated for 21 days, being provided with a nutritional diet and psychological counseling, and receiving expert observation of signs and symptoms [3].

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, measures should be taken in three phases (before deployment, during deployment, and post-deployment) to protect the health of UN peacekeepers. (1) Before deployment. Troop-contributing countries could improve their health protection knowledge and skills and take preventive measures such as physical examination, health education, psychological counseling, vaccination, and PPE preparation before deployment [61]. (2) Duration of deployment. It is necessary to establish effective global health systems that can provide sufficient medical and health services for UN peacekeepers, help them develop healthy life habits, and organize health lectures on the coronavirus during deployment [62]. (3) Post-deployment. To protect the health of UN peacekeepers after missions, it is necessary to pay attention to their health conditions and infection risks when deployed among larger populations. It is recommended to take preventive measures for transportation and quarantine when they arrive home [63].

Multi-level cooperation networks of health protection measures against the COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers

Global health governance calls for establishing cooperative networks to strengthen global health systems from bilateral, regional, and multilateral perspectives among governments, organizations, and others [35]. To produce effective responses to global health problems, it is vital to implement important strategies within cooperative networks and global health systems [38]. The Chinese government and the local government in Liberia cooperated to ensure supplies for the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia [3]. During the Ebola pandemic, the National Ebola Command Center and many international organizations in Liberia were responsible for coordinating responses to the global health problem of Ebola [3].

Referring to the actions of establishing cooperative networks and strengthening global health systems in global health governance, and the experience of the health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia, it is suggested to use multi-level cooperation networks of health protection measures to strengthen global health systems against the COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers. Multilevel cooperation networks of health protection measures are required to enhance cooperation among the UN, host countries, troop-contributing countries, the UN peacekeeping team, and UN peacekeepers for health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic. (1) The UN. The UN could develop preventive strategies to strengthen the global health system against COVID-19 for the health protection of UN peacekeepers [64]. For instance, the Department of Operational Support, the Office of Military Affairs, and the Police Division in the UN can monitor the situation and advise governments according to the latest COVID-19 trends; the Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions in the UN can prepare operational guidance to mitigate the transmission of the COVID-19; the UN Police can outline procedures for UN peacekeepers to follow in daily operations during the COVID-19 pandemic [65]. (2) Host countries. For the health protection of UN peacekeepers, host countries could improve public health systems, provide sufficient medical support, including medicines, and ensure the quality of medical services during COVID-19 [66, 67]. (3) Troop-contributing countries. Troop-contributing countries could prepare UN peacekeepers with health protection knowledge and skills before deployment, provide them with psychological and social support from home during deployment, and organize experts to observe signs and symptoms after deployment [43]. (4) UN peacekeeping teams. As a group, the UN peacekeeping team could train and evaluate the health protection capacity of peacekeepers and organize peer support for their health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic [68,69,70]. (5) UN peacekeepers. Individuals could be encouraged to take initiatives in their health protection against COVID-19 by learning related knowledge and skills, maintaining healthy lifestyles, etc. [43].

Multiple efforts from various dimensions of health protection measures against the COVID-19 pandemic among UN peacekeepers

Based on global health governance, multiple efforts should be made to address global health issues in the political, economic, and social contexts at the local, neighborhood, and household levels [36]. Taking the social determinants of health into account, actions should involve various aspects, such as the implementation of international regulations and laws from security, economics, human rights, and other scopes, to seek multipurpose surveillance and intervention against global health problems [37]. During the Ebola pandemic in Liberia, the Chinese medical team used a bio-psycho-social model to protect their health from various aspects throughout their mission [3]. Given Liberia’s underdeveloped public health system, the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team biologically paid attention to the disinfection of the environment and the use of PEE. Psychologically, they were provided with psychological counseling to ease their worries about diseases, and socially, they gained social support from countries, organizations, colleagues, friends, and families for their health protection and health diplomacy [3].

According to the actions of enabling multiple efforts from various aspects of global health governance and the experience of protecting the Chinese medical team during the Ebola pandemic in Liberia based on the bio-psycho-social model, multiple efforts from various dimensions, including medical, psychological, social, and other measures should be made to protect UN peacekeepers against COVID-19. (1) From a medical perspective, macroscopically, it is vital to improving the efficiency of local public health systems and the capacity of medical personnel for the health protection of UN peacekeepers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizing health training on COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment is recommended, emphasizing the importance of healthy eating and exercising habits and regulating the personal use of PPE, such as mask-wearing among UN peacekeepers [71, 72]. (2) From the psychological dimension, since fear, loneliness, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and other mental health symptoms are considered as causing psychological harm to UN peacekeepers during COVID-19 [73, 74], it is suggested to improve the peacekeepers’ access to psychological help, including face-to-face and online counseling services, and provide them with targeted psychological interventions against COVID-19, such as enhancing their awareness of symptoms, self-care, and peer-support [75, 76]. (3) From the social dimension, helping UN peacekeepers adapt to the local social and cultural environments could make them feel more familiar with and supported in completing missions during the COVID-19 pandemic [77]. Moreover, it is necessary to communicate with and learn from other countries based on health diplomacy, such as coordinating with embassies and visiting medical institutions from other countries [50]. This would assist the peacekeepers in having equipment inspection, logistics support, food supervision, and so on, to enhance their health protection during the COVID-19 pandemic [71].

A generalized conceptual framework for recommendation

The health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic is a global health issue. From global health perspectives and referring to the successful experience of health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia, a conceptual framework can be developed for the health protection of UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic (Fig. 1). The features include multiple cross-borders (cross-borders risk factors, impact, and actions, multiple risk factors such as SDH), multiple interdisciplines (public health, medicine, politics, diplomacy, and others), and multiple interdepartmental cooperation (IGOs, NGOs, PPPs, and others). These strategies include multiple phases (before-deployment, during-deployment, and post-deployment), multi-level cooperation networks (the UN, host countries, troop-contributing countries, the UN peacekeeping team, and UN peacekeepers), and multiple efforts from various dimensions (medical, psychological, and social).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A conceptual framework of the health protection among UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic from global health perspectives.

This figure illustrates the development of a conceptual framework of health protection among UN peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic from global health perspectives, and refers to the successful experience of the health protection of the Chinese Anti-Ebola medical team in Liberia. These features include multiple cross-borders, multiple interdisciplines, and multiple interdepartmental cooperation. These strategies include multi-phases, multilevel cooperation networks, and multiple efforts from various dimensions

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Corona Virus Disease 2019

UN:

United Nations

WHO:

World Health Organization

IGOs:

Intergovernmental Organizations

NGOs:

Nongovernmental Organizations

PPPs:

Public-private partnerships

PPE:

Personal protective equipment

SDH:

Social determinants of health

References

  1. United Nations. What is peacekeeping. 2021. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/what-we-do. Accessed 25 March 2022.

  2. Department of Defense Office of Peacekeeping Affairs. New situation, new challenge, new development. J PLA Inst Int Relat. 2017;112:3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ying L, Wang H, Jin XR. Experiences and challenges in the health protection of medical teams in the Chinese Ebola treatment center, Liberia: a qualitative study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ying L. Military participation in global health progress: concepts, practices and trends. J Third Mil Med Univ. 2019;19:7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He Y. Reflection on security risks and countermeasures in United Nations peacekeeping operations. World Econ Politics. 2018;5:60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). 2021. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  8. Tabari P, Amini M, Khoshnood K, et al. Multi-dimensional effects of the COVID-19 pandemic considering the WHO’s ecological approach. Glob Public Health. 2021;16:136–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Northwestern University. COVID-19 and UN peacekeeping: Posing existing global governance questions with new urgency. https://wccias.northwestern.edu/covid-19-research/covid19-and-un-peacekeeping-posing-existing-global-governance-questions-with-new-urgency.html. Accessed 6 June 2022.

  10. United Nations Security Council. United Nations Security Council Resolution 2518—S/RES/2518. (2020) [EB/OL]. 2020. https://www.un.org/en/documents/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2518 (2020). Accessed 25 March 2022.

  11. Chaufan C, Dutescu IA, Fekre H, et al. The military as a neglected pathogen transmitter, from the nineteenth century to COVID-19: a systematic review. Glob Health Res Policy. 2021;6:48.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations. Impact of COVID-19 on UN peacekeeping. https://peacekeeping.un.org/zh/impact-of-covid-19-un-peacekeeping. Accessed 25 March 2022.

  13. United Nations. COVID 19 Pre-deployment awareness training (UN C-PAT) Instructors Course Handbook. 2020. https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/staying-fit-time-covid-19-%E2%80%93-tips-un. Accessed 25 March 2022.

  14. The United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support. Core pre-deployment training materials for United Nations peacekeeping operations. 2017. https://research.un.org/revisedcptm2017. Accessed 25 March 2022.

  15. Guterres A. Remarks to the Security Council on the COVID-19 Pandemic. United Nations. http://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2020-04-09/remarks-security-council-covid-19-pandemic. Accessed 25 March 2022.

  16. Qiu L, Li YJ, Rao W. Analysis on the legal issue of UN peacekeeping operations in response to pandemics. PLA Hosp Manag J. 2021;28:921–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lone SA, Ahmad A. COVID-19 pandemic—an African perspective. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:1300–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Xiang D, Alejok N. Coping with COVID-19 in United Nations peacekeeping field hospitals: increased workload and mental stress for military healthcare providers. BMJ Mil Health. 2021;167(4):229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitayama S, Camp NP, Salvador CE. Culture and the COVID-19 pandemic: multiple mechanisms and policy implications. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2022;16(1):164–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollard CA, Morran MP, Nestor-Kalinoski AL. The COVID-19 pandemic: a global health crisis. Physiol Genom. 2020;52:549–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasidharan S, Dhillon HS. Ebola. COVID-19 and Africa: what we expected and what we got. Dev World Bioeth. 2021;21:51–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Makosso AM. United Nations peacekeeping operations in the era of COVID-19. J Intell Confl Warfare. 2020;3:25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Charbonneau B. The COVID-19 test of the United Nations Security Council. Int J. 2021;76:6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Institute of Medicine. America’s vital interest in global health. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 1997. https://doi.org/10.17226/5717.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, Wasserheit JN. Consortium of Universities for Global Health Executive Board. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373:1993–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kickbush I. The need for a european strategy on global health. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:561–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beaglehole R, Bonita R. What is global health? Global Health Action. 2010;3:1354–60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Macfarlane SB, Jacobs M, Kaaya EE. In the name of global health: trends in academic institutions. J Public Health Policy. 2008;29:383–401. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marmot M, Friel S. Evidence-based public health policy and practice: global health equity: evidence for action on the social determinants of health. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2008;62(12):1095–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baum F, Lawless A, Delany T, et al. Evaluation of health in all policies: concept, theory and application. Health Promot Int. 2014;29:i130–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blättner B. Covid-19 and health inequality: the relevance of the HiAP approach to pandemics. Public Health Forum. 2020;182–184.

  32. World Health Organization. The Helsinki statement on health in all policies. The 8th global conference on health promotion. World Health Organization and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Finland Helsinki, Finland. 2013:10–14.

  33. World Health organization. Health in all policies: framework for country action. https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/140120HPRHiAPFramework.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2022.

  34. Youde JR. Global Health Governance in International Society. Oxford University Press; 2018.

  35. Fidler DP. The Challenges of Global Health Governance. The Council on Foreign Relations; 2010.

  36. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, et al. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. David PF. From international sanitary conventions to global health security: the new international health regulations. Chin J Int Law. 2005;4:325–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. International Health Partnership and Related Initiatives (IHP+), http://www.internationalhealthpartnership.net/en/home; the “Health 8” are WHO, UNICEF, UN Population Fund, UNAIDS, Global Fund, GAVI, Gates Foundation, and the World Bank; and UN System Influenza Coordination, http://www.undg.org/index.cfm?P=21. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  39. Gilder A. The role of UN Peace Operations in Countering Health Insecurity after COVID-19. Glob Policy. 2022;13(2):271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Emmanuel U, Osondu ED, Kalu KC. Architectural design strategies for infection prevention and control (IPC) in health-care facilities: towards curbing the spread of Covid-19. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020;18:1699–707.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. de Coning C. Examining the longer-term effects of covid-19 on UN peacekeeping operations. Global Observatory. https://nupi.brage.unit.no/nupi-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2684680/de+Coning+2020+Examining+the+Longer-Term+Effects+of+COVID-19+on+UN+Peacekeeping+Operations+-+IPI+Global+Observatory.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  42. Assan NE, Morgan H. The recruitment, enlistment, and deployment of HIV-positive military service members: an evaluation of South African and U.S. National, alongside international, policies. Mil Med. 2021;186:897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ying L, Shenglan T, et al. Health maintenance of peacekeeping troops from the perspective of global health. Chin J Prev Med. 2015;3:4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tobin J. Occupational stress and UN peacekeepers. Ir J Psychol Med. 2015;32:205–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen SD, Sun XY, Zhang LY, et al. Psychological maladjustment of asian and african peacekeepers in Liberia and its related factors. Psychol Health Med. 2016;21:460–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Harring N, Jagers SC, Löfgren Å. COVID-19: large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust. World Dev. 2021;138:105236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomas AG, Grillo MP, Djibo DA, Hale B, Shaffer RA. Military HIV policy assessment in sub-Saharan Africa. Mil Med. 2014;179(7):773–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rogers AH, Shepherd JM, Garey L, et al. Psychological factors associated with substance use initiation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rashkow BC. UN peacekeeping in a time of pandemic: reconciling armed conflict management while helping to fight COVID-19. J Nat’l Sec L Pol’y. 2020;11:285.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu F, Qian H. Uncertainty analysis of facemasks in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Environ Pollut. 2022;303:119167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mahase E. Covid-19: hospital admission 50–70% less likely with omicron than delta, but transmission a major concern. BMJ. 2021;375:n3151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rezrazi EM. Peacekeeping missions in the time of coronavirus: new configurations and new challenges. Policy Center for the New South. http://www.policycenter.ma. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  53. Dorussen H. Peacekeeping after Covid-19. Peace economics. Peace Sci Public Policy. 2020;26(3):1–09.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fazal TM. Health diplomacy in pandemical times. Int Organ. 2020;74:E78-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jennings C. Astin FA multi-disciplinary approach to prevention. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:77–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. de Villiers C, Cerbone D, Van Zijl W. The south african government’s response to COVID-19. J Public Budg Acc Financ Manag. 2020;32(5):797–811.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Melnick ER, Ioannidis JPA. Should governments continue lockdown to slow the spread of covid-19? BMJ. 2020;369:m1924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. The United Nations. WHO, UNFPA. UNICEF, UNAIDS and the World. Bank (H4+) commit to mobilize political support for the Global Strategy in the 49 ’Lowest Income Countries. https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/who-unfpa-unicef-unaids-and-world-bank-h4-commit-mobilize-political-support-global. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  59. World Health Organization. The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network. https://extranet.who.int/goarn/. Accessed 20 May 2022.

  60. United Nations. Coronavirus Global Health Emergency. https://www.un.org/coronavirus. Accessed 14 April, 2022.

  61. Nemțeanu MS, Dabija DC. Best practices of nongovernmental organizations in combatting COVID-19. New Trends Sustain Bus Consum. 2020;626.

  62. Xiang Z, Lichao Y. Strategies and enlightenments for the prevention and control of the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic of the peacekeeping medical unit in Congo (DRC). PLA J Prev Med. 2020;38:3.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cohen J. China’s vaccine gambit. Science. 2020;370(6522):1263–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cao JH, Han YQ. The practice and experience of the South Sudan peacekeeping medical team in the prevention and control of the new crown epidemic. People’s Mil Med. 2021;64:88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kochani L. Does higher quality peacekeepers equal better civilian protection?: A qualitative research study on UN-peacekeeping effectiveness in Mali and the DRC. 2021.

  66. Pradhan D, Biswasroy P, Kumar Naik P, et al. A review of current interventions for COVID-19 prevention. Arch Med Res. 2020;363–374.

  67. Allam M, Cai S, Ganesh S, et al. COVID-19 diagnostics, tools, and prevention. Diagnostics. 2020;10(6).

  68. Wang HP, Xie SY, Liu CH, et al. Strategies and enlightenment of the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control of the peacekeeping medical team to Congo. J Prev Med Chin PLA. 2020;38:8.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shen J, Duan H, Zhang B, et al. Prevention and control of COVID-19 in public transportation: experience from China. Environ Pollut. 2020;266:115291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zheng XY, Han YL, Ilona KB, et al. Global health diplomacy: the combination of public health globalization and the development of modern diplomacy. Popul Dev. 2011;5:8.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Allouche J, te Lintelo DJH. Humanitarianism and Covid-19: structural dilemmas, fault lines, and new perspectives. IDS Bull. 2022;53(2).

  72. Nik Hasan NN, Hamzah A. Global partnership under a new normal: challenges and response to COVID-19. Partnersh Goals. 2021;511–522.

  73. Bwire G, Ario AR, Eyu P, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic in the african continent. BMC Med. 2022;20:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Qiu YK, Fu YY, Liu GC, et al. Disease types of patients in the Congo (DRC) peacekeeping secondary hospital under the new crown pneumonia epidemic. J Pract Med. 2021;38:3.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang Y, Xiang D, Alejok N. Coping with COVID-19 in United Nations peacekeeping field hospitals: increased workload and mental stress for military healthcare providers. BMJ Mil Health. 2021;167:229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cullen W, Gulati G, Kelly BD. Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic. QJM. 2020;311–312.

  77. Groarke JM, Berry E, Graham-Wisener L, et al. Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0239698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Shenglan Tang from the Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, who provided support in developing the Project.

Funding

This study was funded by the Project (20QNPY019). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Quan Yuan and Yong Chen contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Service Management, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China

    Quan Yuan, Yong Chen, Rui Zhang, Miaomiao Liao, Zhaogang Li, Jiani Zhou & Ying Li

  2. National Engineering Research Center of Immunological Products, Department of Microbiology and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Jiqing Wan

Authors
  1. Quan Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiqing Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miaomiao Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhaogang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiani Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL designed the study. All authors have provided inputs to the manuscript draft. YL provided valuable information. All authors have revised the article and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, Q., Chen, Y., Wan, J. et al. Developing a conceptual framework for the health protection of United Nations peacekeepers against the COVID-19 pandemic from global health perspectives. glob health res policy 7, 45 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00280-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-022-00280-0

Keywords

Global Health Research and Policy

ISSN: 2397-0642

Contact us