Skip to main content
Download PDF

Patient views of the good doctor in primary care: a qualitative study in six provinces in China

Global Health Research and Policy volume 8, Article number: 24 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

China has been striving to train primary care doctors capable of delivering high-quality service through general practitioner training programs and family doctor team reforms, but these initiatives have not adequately met patient needs and expectations. In order to guide further reform efforts to better meet patient expectations, this study generates a profile of the good doctor in primary care from the patient perspective.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in six provinces (Shandong, Zhejiang, Henan, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Heilongjiang) in China. A total of 58 interviewees completed the recorded interviews. Tape-based analysis was used to produce narrative summaries. Trained research assistants listened to the recordings of the interviews and summarized them by 30-s segments. Thematic analysis was performed on narrative summaries to identify thematic families.

Results

Five domains and 18 attributes were generated from the analysis of the interview data. The domains of the good doctor in primary care from the patient perspective were: strong Clinical Competency (mentioned by 97% of participants) and Professionalism & Humanism (mentioned by 93% of participants) during service delivery, followed by Service Provision and Information Communication (mentioned by 74% and 62% of participants, respectively). Moreover, Chinese patients expect that primary care doctors have high educational attainment and a good personality (mentioned by 41% of participants).

Conclusions

This five-domain profile of the good doctor in primary care constitutes a foundation for further primary care workforce capacity building. Further primary care reform efforts should reflect the patient views and expectations, especially in the family physician competency framework and primary care performance assessment system development. Meanwhile, frontline primary care organizations also need to create supportive environments to assist competent doctors practice in primary care, especially through facilitating the learning of primary care doctors and improving their well-being.

Background

Strengthening the service capacity of doctors in Primary Health Care (PHC) has been proposed as an efficient approach to transform the current hospital-centric delivery system into PHC-based delivery system in China [1, 2]. During the last decade, China has implemented various policies aimed at training more qualified primary care doctors and reforming the primary care delivery models to ensure high-quality service provision [3].

To train a sufficient number of qualified primary care doctors, in 2011, the State Council issued a national guideline to develop a unique general practitioner (GP) training program, which included both the long-term “5 + 3” GP residency training model (five-year undergraduate medical education followed by three-year standardized GP residency training) and short-term clinical specialty transfer training model (1-year training for existing primary care providers who want to register as GPs) [3]. To address the pressing challenges of an ageing population and the growing burden of chronic diseases, in 2018, the State Council set a new national target of providing five GPs per 10,000 population by 2030 and released another national guideline to enhance the quality of GP training programs [4]. The main policy efforts focus on encouraging medical schools to build departments/schools of general practice, provide mandatory courses in general practice, build general practice teaching sites, and develop training standard. The residency training hospitals are required to increase the number of general practice resident positions and build independent departments of general practice to provide general practice services. The guidelines also encourage the development of continuing medical education, including digital training courses and tele-education models. These training programs have achieved remarkable results, leading to the tripling of qualified GPs from 0.15 million in 2013 to 0.41 million in 2020 [5].

To transform PHC towards high-quality service provision, China has, since 2016, implemented reforms to support the building of the family doctor team model, which typically integrates family doctors, registered nurses and public health physicians to provide basic medical care services, public health services, and individualized health management to local residents in a community [6]. Meanwhile, performance assessment policies were developed to link the payment of practitioners in the family doctor team to the following performance indicators: number of patients signing contracts with the team, service quantity and quality, outcomes of health management, patient satisfaction, and cost, etc. [6]. Following the achievements of the family doctor team reform, in 2022, another national policy was issued to promote high quality family doctor team building, especially in expanding the sources of family doctors, strengthening family doctors’ clinical competency training, enlarging the scope of service provision, and optimizing the service delivery approach [7].

Despite the improvement of the service capacity of primary care doctors based on these reform efforts, evidence shows that Chinese residents still prefer to bypass PHC services when they seek health care. For example, the number of outpatient visits in primary care has increased by 25.40% (from 3.61 billion in 2010 to 4.53 billion in 2019) [3, 8,9,10], but the proportion of outpatient visits to primary care in the whole system has decreased from 61.87% to 2010 to 53.17% in 2020 [11, 12]. There is national consensus that the service capacity of primary care doctors failing to meet patient expectations is the key reason. As China is moving towards building a People-Centered Integrated Care (PCIC) system based on strong PHC, as suggested by World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank [13, 14], generating knowledge on patients’ expectations, values and preferences regarding the “good doctor” in primary care is important to ensure that patients’ voices are heard and reflected in further reform efforts in China.

Previous studies mostly focus on examining the patient expectations of good PHC in a broad perspective and are dominantly in Europe and North America [15,16,17,18]. Only few studies have been conducted to explore the patient expectation of good doctors in primary care setting. For example, a study from the Netherland found that patients had high expectation of good GP in areas of sufficient consultation time, availability of appointments at short notice, and being given detailed information about their illness [19]. A UK study found that the patients placed higher priority on the technical quality of care and continuity of care with their primary care physicians [20]. A recent study in Israel reported that the most important attributes of a “good doctor” from the public perspective are knowledge and professionalism, credibility and honesty, humaneness, listening and patience [21]. However, there are differences between countries in the importance patients attach to aspects of healthcare [22]. Evidence suggests that health system investments, culture and the human development context have stronger influences on patients’ priorities for their health systems than individual level factors such as age, sex, education, health status, and utilization of health services [16, 23]. Therefore, it is necessary to generate knowledge based on China context. In this study, we undertook a qualitative study in six Chinese provinces to generate the profile of the good doctor in primary care in China.

Methods

Study design

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was conducted among primary care users from six provinces (one city in each province), including the eastern region (Jinan City in Shandong Province and Hangzhou City in Zhejiang Province); the central region (Luoyang City in Henan Province, Taiyuan City in Shanxi Province and Harbin City in Heilongjiang Province); and the western region (Xi’an City in Shaanxi Province) [24].

Interview guide development

The interview guide was initially developed based on a literature review, followed by a pilot study among 15 primary care users in Xi’an in August 2020 and expert discussion to ensure appropriateness, relevance and linguistic quality. The interview guide included the following sections: general information on the participants; participants’ health and previous care seeking behaviors; and what constitutes “good doctors in primary care” from the participants’ point of view.

Participant recruitment

Eligible participants were 18–80 years old, with no cognitive impairment and having had experiences of visiting doctors in local primary care settings during the past 12 months. Recruitment was facilitated by local government officials through purposive and snowball sampling. The “sampling to theme saturation” strategy, which involves a flexible approach dependent on ongoing data analysis and generating new conceptual ideas to test against the primary data, was used [25]. Initially, we planned to recruit between 8 and 12 participants from each city, which has been identified as a sufficient sample size to identify the themes that emerge as most common to the whole group [26]. The sampling continued until no new themes transpired in the interviews. Our final sample was 58 participants: 11 from Shandong, 11 from Zhejiang, 8 from Shaanxi, 8 from Henan, 8 from Shanxi and 12 from Heilongjiang.

Data collection

After obtaining informed consent from participants, semi-structured interviews were conducted by trained research assistants from April to December 2021 using the tested open-ended qualitative interview guide. During the interview process, our interviewers first asked participants about their health care seeking experiences during the past year. Then, the interviewers encouraged the participants to speak in their own words about their views and expectations for the good doctor in primary care. Such an approach provided flexibility to explore the interviewee’s own values and meanings without imposing preconceived structures, assumptions and language [27]. The interviewers provided interviewees with an explanation of the relevant terms prior to the start of the interview. The interviews were conducted face-to-face, one-on-one and lasted between 30 and 60 min. With the consent of the interviewees, all semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded. Immediately following the interview, interviewer completed debriefing notes to capture contextual details of the interview, including non-verbal communication and the interview process [28]. Interview recordings were uploaded into NVivo12 software.

Data analysis

Thematic analysis was conducted to analyse the interview data [29, 30]. Our analysis was predominantly descriptive, combining deductive and inductive approaches to allow original themes to emerge.

We used tape-based analysis which is more efficient but equally rigorous in comparison to more traditional transcription-based analysis. It allows the analyst to maintain a rigorous and consistent awareness of the coding structure, including continual visual referencing of the coding structure while listening to the interview [31, 32]. Trained research assistant listened to the recording of the interviews and summarized them for each 30-s segment. In addition, the research assistants noted themes from the analytic framework or made notes about the behaviour of the interviewee, such as hesitations, lack of comfort, refusal to answers or tangents. The narrative summary preserved the narrative flow of the interview, while showing relevant quotations or transcriptions and parallel analytic notations as well as facilitating the deidentification of data to protect participant confidentiality. This data analysis approach has been tested and used by other qualitative researchers [33].

Next, thematic analysis was performed. Codes were initially derived independently by two analysts. The analysts had several meetings to discuss coding and finalize the codebook. Once the codebook was established, one analyst continued to code the remaining narrative summaries, which were then verified by the second analyst [24, 34]. Any disagreements between the two analysts were discussed with the whole research team, to reach consensus.

The codes were initially assigned to the following domains: communication and interpersonal skills, professionalism & humanism, diagnostic acumen, practice scope, and personal characteristics, based upon existing frameworks and relevant studies regarding good doctors in primary care [35,36,37,38,39,40], while considering our previous study about patient perspectives on primary care in China [41]. The codes in each domain were then categorized into sub-domains (attributes) based on their meaning in the Chinese context. We also modified the structure and components of domains following the analysis process. Three group discussions within the research team were conducted to finalize the final profile of good doctors in primary care from the patients’ perspective.

Results

Participant characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the 58 participants who had visited community health centers in urban China within the past 12 months. Half of the participants were female and had a college education or above; 80% were under 60 years-old; 25% had one or more chronic diseases; and 71% were covered by urban employee basic medical insurance (UEBMI), for urban employed and retired, with the rest covered by urban and rural resident basic medical insurance (URRBMI), which covers the unemployed, students and children. We performed subgroup analysis of patients’ view of the good doctor by age, sex, medical insurance, chronic disease status (yes/no). The results did not vary across subpopulations.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants (N = 58)
Full size table

Five domains of the good doctor in primary care from the patient perspective

The following five domains including 18 attributes were generated from the analysis of the interview data: Clinical Competency (mentioned by 97% of participants), Professionalism & Humanism (mentioned by 93% of participants), Service Provision (mentioned by 74% of participants), Information Communication (mentioned by 62% of participants), and Personal Characteristics (mentioned by 41% of participants). Table 2 presents the five domains, their attributes, and poignant quotes.

From the patients’ perspective, the good primary care doctor with strong Clinical Competency should hold professional qualification in general practice with rich clinical experience and comprehensive medical knowledge, could make a quick and accurate diagnosis, and prescribe effective treatment to quickly relieve a patients’ symptoms. Meanwhile, the good doctor is also expected to have strong competency in Professionalism & Humanism, which means she or he should treat patients with good service attitude while maintaining medical professionalism. At the same time, he or she should demonstrate respect, patience, and empathy toward their patients and have a comprehensive knowledge of their patients from a social determinant of health perspective. Besides Clinical Competency and Professionalism & Humanism, the good primary care doctor is also expected to have strong Information Communication competency, which means that he or she should gather sufficient information on the patients and their conditions, through proactively asking questions and patiently listening to their patients, and give clear explanations about the conditions, treatment and prescriptions. The Service Provision domain suggests that the good doctor with these strong competencies is expected to provide services including treatment of common diseases, public health services, especially health management and follow-up services, through an efficient approach involving the same doctor providing services each time, appropriate referrals, out-of-hour services, and online consultation. Finally, the good primary care doctor is a doctor with a good personality who is middle-aged and has at least a bachelor’s degree.

Discussion

As China is moving towards building a PCIC model of care based on strong PHC, further reform efforts are needed to train competent primary care doctors and improve their performance. These reform efforts should reflect patients’ views and expectations of good doctors in primary care. Based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with primary care users in six provinces, this study has generated a clear profile of the good doctor in primary care from the patient’s perspective in China. Chinese patients expect their primary care doctors to have strong Clinical Competency, Professionalism & Humanism, followed by Service Provision and Information Communication. In addition, Chinese patients also expect their primary care doctors to have comprehensive medical knowledge, high educational attainment and good personality.

Clinical Competency is the most valued domain of the good primary care doctor by Chinese patients. This result is consistent with studies in other countries [18] and the recent studies in China [42, 43]. However, previous studies did not provide the operational definition of clinical competency in the Chinese context. Based on the data from six provinces, this study isolated five attributes of clinical competency, presenting a clear picture of what clinical competency entails from the perspective of patients in China. A good doctor with strong clinical competency should be a general practitioner with rich clinical experiences, comprehensive medical knowledge and high clinical skills, who could make quick and accurate diagnosis, and provide quick relief of the patients’ symptom. These attributes have been positively linked in other studies with high quality care [44,45,46,47,48,49], and have also been shown to be strong predictors of patients’ choice of primary care providers [50, 51].

The Professionalism & Humanism domain of the good doctor in primary care, which is valued by most participants, includes six attributes: good service attitude, respect, patience, empathy, professionalism, and knowledge of patient. This six-attribute structure gives the operational definition of Professionalism & Humanism domain in Chinese primary care. This domain is also highly valued by the patient population in other countries. For example, a previous systematic review summarizing patient priorities for primary care studies published before 2000s reported that humanism was the most important aspect from patient views, which was ranked highest in 86% of the studies that included this aspect [18]. A recent literature review on how patients want their doctor to communicate also revealed that most patients expected their doctors to be friendly, respectful, interested, non-judgmental and sensitive and to treat patients as a person and as a partner [39]. Recognizing the importance of this domain, humanities medical courses have been offered in medical school, and this domain has been included in recent studies on the competency of Chinese general practitioners [52].

Our study participants suggested that the Information Communication domain of the good doctor in primary care should involve two processes: gathering information and providing information. During the information gathering process, patients expected that their doctor inquire about their illness in detail and listen to them for a sufficient length of time. Before making a treatment decision, patients value a detailed explanation of their condition and treatment plan. This is consistent with evidence from Lithuania, Malaysia, Sweden, Hungary, and Poland [53,54,55,56,57]. Also, this corresponds to the international call for patients’ active participation in decision-making, which requires doctors to be good at identifying patient needs and patients to be brave enough to clearly express their wishes and seek consensus on treatment together [58]. Good communication, such as better listening skills, could not only influence patient decision to see the doctor, but also further enhance patient adherence to treatment regimens and result in better health outcomes. There is extensive evidence that good communication is associated with improved clinical outcomes, reduced medical errors, and facilitated patient self-management and preventive behaviors [59,60,61].

Table 2 Five domains, 18 attributes and their exemplar quotes generated from qualitative interviews among 58 participants
Full size table

Transforming the hospital-centric system into primary care-based delivery system is a key component of further national reform efforts. From the patients’ perspective, the good primary care doctor should provide services of common disease treatment and public health, especially health management and follow-up through a continuous and coordinated approach, which involves the same doctor providing services each time as well as appropriate referral services, out-of-hour services, and online consultation. As China is moving towards building PCIC system, the family doctor team, providing integrated primary care and public health services based on local community residents’ health needs, is one of the key reform efforts to better meet patients’ needs and expectations, especially in the service provision domain. In fact, the Service Provision that patients expect in our study is also the service content provided by the Chinese family doctor team. The recent national policy also proposes to expand the scope of services by primary care doctors and provide services through in-person and online approaches based on different digital tools. Further policy evaluation is needed to examine if these policies could better meet patients’ expectations.

Personal Characteristics, such as high educational attainment and age-related maturity, were also highlighted by patients. Age-related expectations, which link age, experience and skill levels, are deeply rooted in the Chinese culture, even though age and performance are not necessarily positively correlated [62, 63]. According to Chinese physician recruitment rules, doctors with lower education and experience are more likely to work in primary care institutions than hospitals. The majority of these physicians therefore hold medical degree at undergraduate level or below, which means lower Clinical Competency from the patient perspective. This may be one of the reasons why patients prefer the hospital system when they seek care [3, 64].

Our study findings have several implications for practice and policy. China has a strong political commitment to build a PCIC system based on high-performing PHC system. Training, recruiting and retaining qualified doctors in primary care is a foundational approach. The five domains and their specific attributes of the good primary care doctor could help guide further initiatives to strengthen family medicine education and practice. First, a national family physician competency framework should be developed to guide medical school training and residency training. The five-year medical school training program in China is currently mainly based on medicinal theories and clinical medicine, as well as basic knowledge of preventive medicine. The main target of the three-year residency training program is to improve clinical and public health practice competency, and training evaluation focuses on numbers of diseases, numbers of cases, and clinical and public health practice competencies. Information Communication competency as well as Professionalism & Humanism are not emphasized in these programs. For continuing medical education, the most frequent training topics are basic clinical theory knowledge and clinical practice skills [65], although doctors in primary care in China have a great need for communication skills training [65]. This framework could define the abilities needed from family physicians across the educational continuum of undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional development, especially in Clinical Competency, Professionalism & Humanism and Information Communication, which are prioritized by patients. Second, Chinese patients expect the good primary care doctor to have comprehensive medical knowledge and constantly learn to update their knowledge, which points out the importance of building a learning primary care system. Local primary care organizations should be supported and encouraged to build learning organizations through need-based continuing professional development programs. Third, daily management practices of primary care organizations should also be further reformed to support wellbeing of primary care doctors. For primary care practices, low job satisfaction and high occupational burnout are widespread among primary care doctors in China [3]. One of the reasons is that China’s primary care doctors have to undertake both medical and public health work, with heavy workloads making it difficult to devote sufficient time for each patient to communicate and show more humanism during clinical encounters [66]. Appropriate digital health technologies as well as a supportive organizational culture could facilitate this reform process.

Our study results need to be interpreted in light of its limitations. There is a high demand for health care among the rural population. Their expectations were not explored in this study. Future studies could investigate the preferences of rural populations for doctors in primary care and compare them with those of urban populations. Second, despite rigorous methods to maintain trustworthiness, translation of original statements into English for publication purposes may have resulted in some linguistic inconsistencies. Finally, participants were asked to recall their past experiences, which may have impacted the accuracy of their accounts.

Conclusions

Guided by Chinese patients’ views, this study has generated a profile of the good doctor in primary care that includes five domains: Clinical Competency, Professionalism & Humanism, Service Provision, Information Communication, and Personal Characteristics. Further primary care reform efforts should reflect these patients’ expectations. Ongoing family medicine education reform should consider building a national family physician competency framework to guide medical school training and family medicine residency training, especially in areas of Clinical Competency, Professionalism & Humanism, and Information Communication. Further management practice reform within primary care organizations is also needed to provide a supportive organizational context for competent doctors to practice in primary care and continue their learning.

Availability of data and materials

Data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to protect the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. Aggregate data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PHC:

Primary Health Care

GP:

General Practitioner

PCIC:

People-Centered Integrated Care

WHO:

World Health Organization

UEBMI:

Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance

URRBMI:

Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance

References

  1. Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yip W, Fu H, Chen AT, et al. 10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in Universal Health Coverage. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1192–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2584–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tam YH, Leung JYY, Ni MY, Ip DKM, Leung GM. Training sufficient and adequate general practitioners for universal health coverage in China. BMJ. 2018;362:k3128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Health Commission. 2020 China Health Development Statistical Bulletin. 2021. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s10743/202107/af8a9c98453c4d9593e07895ae0493c8.shtml. Accessed 30 March 2023.

  6. National Health and Family Planning Commission. Guideline for promoting family doctor contract service. 2016. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-06/06/content_5079984.htm. Accessed 30 March 2023.

  7. National Health Commission. Guideline for promoting family doctor contract service high quality development. 2022. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/15/content_5679177.htm. Accessed 30 March 2023.

  8. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. China health statistical yearbook 2009. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li X, Krumholz HM, Yip W, et al. Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1802–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China health statistical yearbook 2019. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. China health statistical yearbook 2010. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China health statistical yearbook 2020. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: interim report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. People-centred and integrated health services: an overview of the evidence: interim report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleij KS, Tangermann U, Amelung VE, Krauth C. Patients’ preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung HP, Baerveldt C, Olesen F, Grol R, Wensing M. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect. 2003;6(2):160–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, et al. Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on patient evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP). Fam Pract. 1999;16(1):4–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(10):1573–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung HP, Wensing M, Grol R. What makes a good general practitioner: Do patients and doctors have different views? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(425):805–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, et al. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(2):107–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dopelt K, Bachner YG, Urkin J, Yahav Z, Davidovitch N, Barach P. Perceptions of practicing Physicians and Members of the Public on the attributes of a “Good Doctor.” Healthcare (Basel). 2021;10(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Groenewegen PP, Kerssens JJ, Sixma HJ, van dEI, Boerma WG. What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Valentine N, Darby C, Bonsel GJ. Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO’s general population surveys of “health systems responsiveness” in 41 countries. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(9):1939–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagaman AK, Wutich A. How many interviews are enough to identify Metathemes in Multisited and Cross-cultural Research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study. Field Method. 2017;29(1):23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Britten N. Qualitative research: qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995;311(6999):251–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Corkrey R, Parkinson L. Interactive voice response: review of studies 1989–2000. Behav Res Methods Inst C. 2002;34(3):342–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Braun V, Clarke V, Terry G. Thematic analysis. 2014. p. 95–113.

  31. Anderson C, Kirkpatrick S. Narrative interviewing. Int J Clin Pharm-Net. 2016;38(3):631–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tessier S. From field notes, to transcripts, to tape recordings: evolution or combination? Int J Qual Meth. 2012;11(4):446–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Richard L, Furler J, Densley K, et al. Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kvale S. Validity in the qualitative research interview. Psykologisk Skriftserie Aarhus. 1987.

  35. Wensing M, Grol R, van Montfort P, Smits A. Indicators of the quality of general practice care of patients with chronic illness: a step towards the real involvement of patients in the assessment of the quality of care. Qual Health Care. 1996;5(2):73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson R, Barbara A, Feldman S. What patients want: a content analysis of key qualities that influence patient satisfaction. J Med Pract Manag. 2007;22(5):255–61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marcinowicz L, Chlabicz S, Grebowski R. Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Levine R, Shore K, Lubalin J, Garfinkel S, Hurtado M, Carman K. Comparing physician and patient perceptions of quality in ambulatory care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(4):348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deledda G, Moretti F, Rimondini M, Zimmermann C. How patients want their doctor to communicate. A literature review on primary care patients’ perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(3):297–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee K, Wright SM, Wolfe L. The clinically excellent primary care physician: examples from the published literature. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang W, Haggerty J, Loban EK, Liu X. Evaluating Primary Health Care performance from user perspective in China: review of survey instruments and implementation issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Fu P, Wang Y, Liu S, et al. Analysing the preferences for family doctor contract services in rural China: a study using a discrete choice experiment. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang H, Sun H, Jin C, et al. Preference to family doctor contracted service of patients with chronic disease in urban China: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:2103–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Holmboe ES, Wang Y, Meehan TP, et al. Association between maintenance of certification examination scores and quality of care for medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wenghofer E, Klass D, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Doctor scores on national qualifying examinations predict quality of care in future practice. Med Educ. 2009;43(12):1166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shuval K, Linn S, Brezis M, Shadmi E, Green ML, Reis S. Association between primary care physicians’ evidence-based medicine knowledge and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(1):16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kristjansson E, Hogg W, Dahrouge S, Tuna M, Mayo-Bruinsma L, Gebremichael G. Predictors of relational continuity in primary care: patient, provider and practice factors. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Muggah E, Hogg W, Dahrouge S, et al. Patient-reported access to primary care in Ontario: effect of organizational characteristics. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(1):e24–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Cheung A, Stukel TA, Alter DA, et al. Primary care physician volume and quality of diabetes care: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(4):240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mercado F, Mercado M, Myers N, Hewit M, Haller NA. Patient preferences in choosing a primary care physician. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012;3(2):125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Leach B, Gradison M, Morgan P, Everett C, Dill MJ, de Oliveira JS. Patient preference in primary care provider type. Healthcare (Amsterdam). 2018;6(1):13–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wei Y, Wang FY, Wang MR. Recent advances in position-specific competencies evaluation system development for chinese general practitioners. Chin Gen Pract. 2021;24(19):2394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zebiene E, Razgauskas E, Basys V, et al. Meeting patient’s expectations in primary care consultations in Lithuania. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(1):83–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hassali M, Shafie A, Khan T. General Public Expectation from the communication process with their Healthcare Providers. J Young Pharm. 2012;4(3):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Marcinowicz L, Pawlikowska T, Oleszczyk M. What do older people value when they visit their general practitioner? A qualitative study. Eur J Ageing. 2014;11(4):361–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Freilich J, Wiking E, Nilsson GH, Olsson C. Patients’ ideas, concerns, expectations and satisfaction in primary health care—a questionnaire study of patients and health care professionals’ perspectives. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(4):468–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Nanasi A, Ungvari T, Kolozsvari LR, et al. Expectations, values, preferences and experiences of hungarian primary care population when accessing services: evaluation of the patient’s questionnaires of the international QUALICOPC study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021;22:e23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Whitaker KL, Ghanouni A, Zhou Y, Lyratzopoulos G, Morris S. Patients’ preferences for GP consultation for perceived cancer risk in primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(659):e388–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and Health Outcomes - a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Price RA, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM. Valuing patient experience as a unique and intrinsically important aspect of Health Care Quality. Jama Surg. 2013;148(10):985–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Eva KW. The aging physician: changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1–S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Marco CA, Wahl RP, House HR, et al. Physician age and performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine ConCert Examination. Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25(8):891–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Song KM, Scott A, Sivey P, Meng QY. Improving chinese primary care providers’ recruitment and retention: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy Plann. 2015;30(1):68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shao S, Wu T, Guo A, et al. The training contents, problems and needs of doctors in urban community health service institutions in China. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Lu S, Zhang L, Klazinga N, Kringos D. More public health service providers are experiencing job burnout than clinical care providers in primary care facilities in China. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the 58 interviewees from six provinces who participated in the study. We also show our thanks to Dr. Katya Loban from McGill University Health Center, Dr. Stephen Nicholas from Newcastle Business School, Dr. Elizabeth Matiland from School of Management, University of Liverpool for their helpful comments for this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 72004179]. The study sponsors had no role in the study design, data analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 28 West Xianning Road, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

    Wenhua Wang, Jinnan Zhang & Jiao Lu

  2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Xiaolin Wei

Authors
  1. Wenhua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinnan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiao Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaolin Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WW conceived this study, developed data analysis plan, drafted the manuscript, and was responsible for data interpretation. WW, JZ, JL, XW conducted the investigation process, data analysis, and were involved in data curation. WW oversaw and guided research activity planning and execution. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolin Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by the Xi’an Jiaotong University Ethics Committee. Prior to conducting the semi-structured interview, written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All interviewees were informed that participation was voluntary, the data were strictly confidential and used only for research purposes.

Consent for publication

Prior to conducting the semi-structured interview, written informed consent was obtained from the participants, with interviewees informed that participation was voluntary, the data were strictly confidential and the study used only for research purposes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Zhang, J., Lu, J. et al. Patient views of the good doctor in primary care: a qualitative study in six provinces in China. glob health res policy 8, 24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00309-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00309-y

Keywords

Global Health Research and Policy

ISSN: 2397-0642

Contact us